3/31/12

SoDA Report: Reading is Innovative


The SoDA Report is 96 pages of interestingness.


Some highlights:

“Agencies are focusing on delivering digital innovation. But…such a focus requires that the agency challenge the status quo for brands. It also requires that they manage the often uncomfortable process that a successful outcome requires.” – Guthrie Dolin, Odopod

True innovation is risky, and most brands don’t take risks. And, in fact, most agencies don’t take risks. The solution is accounting for risk from the beginning of the relationship. It would require a truthfully aggressive pitch and budget allocated for risk/innovation.

“Our clients appreciate that we invest our own resources in the same types of strategies we recommend to them.” – Kenny Tomlin, Rockfish Labs

The Rockfish model is to invest a portion of its resources to developing products for itself. Similar to Anomaly, they make things and don’t only market things. I love his explanation of how it is a selling point. How many smarter recommendations would agencies make if they had to turn around and use the same strategies on their babies/brands?

The social web does an amazing job of sniffing out and calling out lies in seconds…But true honesty is not just the absence of falsehoods. Brands need to go a step further and be honest with themselves and their agencies about the role they can play in their customers’ lives.”  Philip Rackin, Magnani Caruso Dutton

“Agencies often banter around the idea of a 360° offering for brands…this path has the tendency to create a reactive environment in which big picture thinking and more innovative ideas struggle to thrive.” – Guthrie Dolin, Odopod

A 360° offering creates buckets that have to be filled before identifying a problem. Does every product need branded content, etc? The brand has the same issue. As Philip mentions, the brand must be realistic about who they are. Do consumers want to see your branded content, etc?

RACKIN: You market a 300-year old luxury brand. How has social changed the way you think about marketing?
HO: In this industry, there will never be a substitute for face-to-face interactions and tastings. It is a social and visceral product. Nothing is going to change that.” – Charles Ho, Remy Martin

Capitalize on human behavior and choices, for they will remain the most static components of any marketing campaign regardless of any changes in the emerging media environment. What matters when you are buying a cup of coffee four years from now—whether you are paying with cash, a mobile device or an NFC chip embedded in your thumb—will not change.” – Jesse Brightman, AgencyNet

To steal the Gaping Void line, “Technology changes. Humans don’t.” Digital experiences are becoming more and more desired, but for many products, they can never replace the physical experience.   

The overall takeaways seem to be plan for innovation but don’t promise it until you research and identity the problem. Seems logical, but yet a lot of the report focused on how slow innovation has been. I was at first kind of surprised to find a recruiting part of the report, but after reading it, it made a lot of sense, and offered some explanations.

“An unfortunate reality is that the very things that we rely on as indicators of high performance – hiring the brightest students from the top business schools, using current jargon, and employing the same brand pyramids and integrated marketing communications plans – have over time created a marketing culture in which the process of marketing beer is no different from marketing cereal or personal banking. We should preserve the elements that keep us informed (i.e. data and years of collective experience), while embracing innovative practices that require us to do what feels wrong…One thing is certain: defying convention always results in progress.” – Justin Cox, Pereira O’Dell

The biggest barrier to change may be ourselves. We want to protect and validate what got us here: jargon, best practices, years of our lives, etc. In a time when we are challenged to keep up with evolving consumers, the capacity to learn is more valuable than time spent learning.

Anyways, a couple of last points of interestingness.  




I’m surprised to see NFC so low. I’m no expert on it but this kind of makes me want to become one.  

Lastly, I wish the experience of the report allowed for commenting in a SoundCloud/Wiki style. It would be great to put my thoughts next to the paragraphs, and have others comment and share their own opinions.